It’s a question that has been discussed since August of 1945: Was the atomic bombing of two Japanese cities the best way to end World War II? Some argue that the over 100,000 lives lost were far fewer than the likely casualties if the war had continued. Others counter that the attack was wrong because the victims were innocent civilians, not soldiers. What is your view?Should the United States Have Bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
It’s a question that has been discussed since August of 1945: Was the atomic bombing of two Japanese cities the best way to end World War II? Some argue that the over 100,000 lives lost were far fewer than the likely casualties if the war had continued. Others counter that the attack was wrong because the victims were innocent civilians, not soldiers. What is your view?
